Wouldn't you want to write about what the existential risk or more specifically AI safety research entails? I really can't imagine much if anything about it. Except doing thought experiments.
There are two main issues with Kaczinsky's theory: 1) small scale technologies are not characterically distinct from large scale. The seed of human ingenuity pervades. 2) he's a hypocrite. He uses "fc" in the pluralist way that he critiques leftists for. He calls for support but critiques the way leftists do it. It's virtually the same.
Great read. Thank you.
Wouldn't you want to write about what the existential risk or more specifically AI safety research entails? I really can't imagine much if anything about it. Except doing thought experiments.
I already got one strike for reading one of their books aloud on YouTube without a disclaimer. Should I go 2 for 2?
There are two main issues with Kaczinsky's theory: 1) small scale technologies are not characterically distinct from large scale. The seed of human ingenuity pervades. 2) he's a hypocrite. He uses "fc" in the pluralist way that he critiques leftists for. He calls for support but critiques the way leftists do it. It's virtually the same.