12 Comments
User's avatar
Brian J. Cook's avatar

The best place to track global heating is the Climate Brink Dashboard: https://dashboard.theclimatebrink.com/#global. 2026 is on track for 1.58 C +/- 0.07 C above preindustrial levels, and that's without much of the ENSO that is rapidly developing in unprecedented territory. These are just numbers, though. It will only be real to AMERICANS when thousands die repeatedly from the heat and related impacts.

Sally's avatar

I'd also recommend climatetracker.org (https://climatechangetracker.org/) it goes pretty in depth as well

As well as the Climate Action Tracker https://climateactiontracker.org/global/emissions-pathways/

David Michael Swindle 🌀🟦's avatar

Much better with the bold here.

You don’t need to apologize for cursing. Your readers are grown-ups. We can handle R-rated movies. If anything, you should swear more. Profanity is a spice. Just the right amount gives a piece some kick.

Really glad you’re covering the heat. I’m going to start writing about it more too.

Joseph Shipman's avatar

Most of this is good but the “50 million years” number is complete garbage. Please don’t just quote a number you see somewhere without understanding whether it’s based on sound science and math or BS.

Émile P. Torres's avatar

Fair, thanks. Going to delete that short paragraph, as I haven't been able to verify it. Appreciate the feedback!

455 Rocket Cat, Space Donkey's avatar

Glad other people can “look up,” because all I see around me is denial. Older Americans are less familiar with climate change science, and they need to lose power asap for us to save the earth. We need to STOP gas combustion globally and immediately. Disband US Dept of War (Number One Climate Killer) before the name change takes hold.

Sally's avatar

Hey Emile, a great piece as always and I appreciate your work-however I do have some minor objections. More recent data and articles suggest that there are 415 dead zones in the world (https://www.cfoch.org/research/dead-zones) rather than the over 500 figure you presented. I'm also not as certain as you that we will certainly reach 3C by 2050, since this recently-updated trajectory graph shows that it'll only be 2C around 2050 (https://climatechangetracker.org/climate-change-progress/current-trajectory-of-human-induced-global-warming) as well as the intense rise of renewables and solar power (https://biologyinsights.com/will-climate-change-get-better-the-honest-answer)

(https://scienceinsights.org/is-climate-change-getting-better-or-worse/)

Your work is important but these are just some minor objections/observations I have. Keep up the good work!

Sally's avatar

Okay it does appear I misunderstood-you are referring to the Exeter report instead of your own views. To me, the Exeter report reads as "we are anticipating a 60-90% chance of disastrous outcomes if action is not taken and the current path continues" instead of "we will almost certainly experience these outcomes". The report itself also says no other analyses were being undertaken to support it

Émile P. Torres's avatar

Sally: This is incredibly helpful. Thanks so much for sharing this info! I will update my claims in future articles, citing these resources. Really appreciate it. :-)

Sally's avatar

Thanks for the reply. I like to keep good news sources on hand to help temper the overwhelming feelings of helplessness and doom. It's bad right now but it could've been way worse if not for the people who fought so hard, and any and all action taken to mitigate further risk is crucial (we've actually managed to avoid the worst case scenario!) https://theconversation.com/scientists-have-scrapped-the-worst-case-climate-scenario-because-action-is-making-a-difference-283675

The CAT (Climate Action Tracker) is also valuable for keeping track of it https://climateactiontracker.org/global/emissions-pathways/

Thomas Hutt's avatar

Hey Emile, I really appreciate this summary of our situation. I know about most of the things you mention but to have them all put down in one place is really valuable. I don’t want to let the Fascists off the hook but the problem may be bigger than fascism, i.e., bigger than whoever is in charge. Someone recently wrote on Substack something like, “if the socialists come to power they’ll still build data centers ‘for the people’”. I’m not so sure I agree (I think it DOES matter who’s in power) but I get the point.

So, yeah, the Machine wants to turn us into little machines while it gobbles up the ecosphere. There are many ways to resist but I think it starts right where you ended with “solidarity, kindness, and compassion.” Keep up the good work!

Tony Phillips's avatar

Solidarity kindness and revenge!

We need to fight back against these libertarian death cults

(Or extinction cults you might call them)

https://projectallende.org/libertarian-death-cults/