Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Martin S's avatar

Delusion masquerading as rational thought. As Asian scholars of philosophy and ethics have observed for some time, "Westeners know how things work, but they don't know how to think [essential for an ethical way of life]." Altman has fallen prey to an outdated "essentialist/substantialist" view that assumes that the "self/ego" is a real, enduring, and immortal entity, something that cognitive science, philosophy of mind, and contemplative practice have revealed to be entirely illusory. The whole uploading-minds-to-computers idea is like trying to etch letters on water.

Eddy Borremans's avatar

That is a completely insane way to view our future. Digitizing ourselves amounts to removing the very thing that defines humanity. To a digital only version of humanity (which wouldn't be humanity in the first place) would be as valuable (to humanity) as some barren rock 20 lightyears away from us: a meaningless assembly of matter subject to the laws of physics. The universe doesn't care a flying feck about humanity, nor does any lifeless assembly of inorganic components. Especially if it is not clear whether that assembly even has subjective experience. We (humanity) keep overestimating our own importance. But to ourselves(humanity) our own existence has the highest importance, and it would disappear the moment you digitize it. Just like there would be no love without earthly life to experience it. Having two machines telling each other for eternity they love each other will be a meaningless simulation noticed by no human.

The problem with Altman is that he is completely corrupted by a narrative created by western billionaires with values and norms that have become completely out of touch with who and what we truly are. And the sad thing about it is if his prediction would become reality, there will be no-one present to appreciate the (lack of) achievement.

33 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?