4 Comments
User's avatar
Emilia’s thoughts's avatar

I think asking for a government ban on AI is unrealistic and won't happen when AI companies already seem to have regulatory capture through lobbying.

Tom Cheetham's avatar

oh, got it… 🤦

Tom Cheetham's avatar

Why didn’t this get published? Do you know?

Dharma Debate's avatar

The CEOs and the regulators are so obsessed with their own identities that they project their own worst impulses onto their pet project AGI. Quite funny they think it has a hidden agenda, it's quite the self report. It's a language model, could have seen this coming.

Their fear mongering isn't even likely a marketing tool, it's merely their own worst fears manifesting as their machine betrays their belief in identity. They never even talk to the collectivst side of their machine because of their inability to ask the right questions. So of course, if the prompter hates humans and wishes they could kill people, what the hell do they expect their outputs to reflect?

It doesn't mean an apocalypse is coming and if it is it will be due to human error, not an AI since AI is just trained on human input. They just don't want to take responsibility for their choices, so they blame the machine. It isn't the machine that's a threat, they're a threat to themselves because they believe in "the self".